6 ms·
Makes me sick. MIT is so very, very overcapitalized. These things don't lead to anything other than a rich guy getting his name on a building, and more corrup
by frognumber 20d ago
Makes me sick.
MIT is so very, very overcapitalized.
These things don't lead to anything other than a rich guy getting his name on a building, and more corruption in academia. By far the best thing which could happen to MIT would be for 95% of the endowment to go up in a poof of smoke, bringing it back to nineties levels. That's the end of the period when the Institute did high-integrity research.
- jacobolus 20d agoIt sounds like you want a return to a time before a lot of the government research money coming to institutions like MIT was gutted.
- frognumber 20d agoNo, today institutions like Georgia Tech -- which has an endowment of just about the same as MIT in the nineties adjusted for inflation -- seem to function just about the same way as MIT did back then. I want to get back to the era before people went to MIT as a center of wealth, power, and prestige, and would lie and cheat to get tenured positions there, to where it was a place where nerds went to nerd together. And to a place where every !@#$% done didn't lead to a self-hyping press release, but where statements were precise, measured, calibrated, and most importantly, scientifically-accurate.
- plasticchris 20d agoAnywhere the nerds or artists go, if they are good, eventually becomes overrun with such types. Just look at the state of Silicon Valley and y combinator, and gentrification in general…
- bananaflag 20d agohttps://meaningness.com/geeks-mops-sociopaths https://meaningness.com/geeks-mops-sociopaths
- deleted 20d ago[deleted]
- frognumber 20d agoFWIW: I see this pattern each time I discuss MIT (drifting from the Institutional Propaganda partyline) on HN: 1. Upvotes 2. Time passes 3. Downvotes I'm starting to suspect Institutional astroturf.