5 ms·

That’s very nice. Feel free to integrate if you want :) Just request https://classify.stylometry.net/violations/49458161 https://classify.stylometry.net/violat

• Leftium 20d ago
  wow thanks! I integrated like this: https://hn.leftium.com/i/49449507?violation_threshold=0.5 https://hn.leftium.com/i/49449507?violation_threshold=0.5 The url param temporarily sets the threshold, you can permanently set it via the settings. My initial assessment is 0.5 setting is too aggressive; the posts that I generally don't care to read seem to violate multiple rules at once. It's a shame we can't see comment scores so orange highlights could shine through the blurring on "good" comments.
  • costco 19d ago
    Wow that was quick :) Meh, I feel like comment points have become somewhat untethered to comment quality (at least assuming threads are roughly sorted by comment score). It’s a good heuristic usually but it’s wrong often enough for it to be difficult to rely on. I want to improve the classifier scores too. There’s some parameters in the loss function I could play around with more when training which basically optimize for more false negatives or false positives. Problems with no ground truth are very frustrating lol (though I suppose dang/tomhow’s manually written warnings could be treated as labels instead of using labels from GPT, but I suspect there’s not enough of them).