5 ms·
I'm sure their AI can simulate bad executives very effectively. Good ones, not so much. Humorously, the set of agents don't include an AI CEO, just the execs
by rmah 20d ago
I'm sure their AI can simulate bad executives very effectively. Good ones, not so much. Humorously, the set of agents don't include an AI CEO, just the execs underneath the CEO. Someone must set the goals, after all and current LLM's have no agency (yet... thank the gods). Finally, the tasks their LLM agents can supposedly do are more the tasks that the executive's staff handles, not the executive themselves. Unless it's a smaller company, I guess.
- wuschel 20d agoI have no experience with data on bad and good CEOs depending on their working context. At this stage, this seems to be a demo, albeit an interesting one. I find the concept still very intriguing, as it is exactly the thing that attacks white collar functions in administrative and executive tasks sets. I need to give it a spin.
- mr_toad 20d ago> Someone must set the goals, after all and current LLM's have no agency The board might have to take on a more active role in instructing the CEO, just as someone managing an LLM now has to be careful how they prompt it. God forbid the board should make to do more than show up for a few general meetings and collect a fat cheque.