5 ms·
This is what I meant by full stack AI companies. I don't think you could get humans into the loop fast enough if they didn't have some idea of the type of task
by madrox 22d ago
This is what I meant by full stack AI companies. I don't think you could get humans into the loop fast enough if they didn't have some idea of the type of task involved. I don't want people to be asked to fold a tshirt one moment and do a difficult traffic merge the next.
- ntauthority 22d agowarioware shows it can be fun though but i'd indeed not like to see that applied to safety-critical tasks
- its-summertime 22d agoThere is training systems and validation of skills in mturk iirc: for tshirt folding, you'd be given fake setups to be able to get used to controlling the robot, if you can't do it, you won't ever get assignments to do it. For traffic overrides, you'd be tested on having correct knowledge, and once again given supervised tasks to show you can actually be trusted (and there would be safety systems, elevating tasks that can't be performed at your level to people who can, etc) The worker needs to do a bunch to opt into any given work group, which makes the (lack of) payments extremely unreasonable on top of everything else
- inigyou 21d agoIt doesn't really matter what you want though, only what CEOs want and that's low costs. I can see a combined shirt folding/traffic merging platform taking off.
- bonoboTP 21d agoCEOs are loser nobodies. Real influence is with owners, boards, investors.
- inigyou 21d agoMostly they don't care as much as CEOs think they care
- vavos 21d agobut call center are still mostly single client even though it would be cheaper for any worker to be able to answer to any call. So clearly the expertise and context trade off is too big to be worthwhile
- madrox 21d agoYou misinterpret "want" here. My intuition is that you create huge problems for people context switching like this repeatedly for quick tasks.