4 ms·
> to enforce artificial borders and deny everyone this basic freedom. a very postnational view, humanist in a way, lipsius or erasmus would recognize it. that
by trgn 21d ago
> to enforce artificial borders and deny everyone this basic freedom.
a very postnational view, humanist in a way, lipsius or erasmus would recognize it.
that sort of individuated cosmopolitanism only works for educated men and women with means, who have or have the capacity to self-actualize.
not for the masses. the nation is still a cradle to protect and nurture the commonwealth, and given that they took hundreds to sometimes thousands of years to form, i don't think borders are artificial in the least.
- Synaesthesia 21d agoThere's no reason why we should worship borders, or the state.
- UncleOxidant 21d ago> that sort of individuated cosmopolitanism only works for educated men and women with means, who have or have the capacity to self-actualize. So because not everyone can afford to travel freely we shouldn't let anyone do that?
- Razengan 21d ago> and given that they took hundreds to sometimes thousands of years to form, i don't think borders are artificial in the least. "Borders" as they are treated today began barely 200 years ago, and only started being enforced so strictly since WW1 and then even worse after WW2. For the vast >95% of human history, if you could walk to somewhere and survive there, you could live there. The real ironic shit is that most of the travel and immigration restrictions of today are instituted by the descendants of people that invaded and occupied the lands of other people :')
- green_wheel 21d ago> For the vast >95% of human history, if you could walk to somewhere and survive there, you could live there For 95% of human history we were hunter gatherers living in extremely sparsely populated areas.
- Razengan 20d agoWhen was the last time you heard of humans going somewhere where other humans weren't already there? How do you think they got there?