16 ms·
Look - I'm am the opposite of DHH fan -- that said -- they could fix all these bugs/security issues that same way they created them. It makes sense to some exte
by vcryan 21d ago
Look - I'm am the opposite of DHH fan -- that said -- they could fix all these bugs/security issues that same way they created them. It makes sense to some extent to create a product that emphasized what is different about it from a feature/UX perspective so people can consider if it would even be useful to them at all. If they can prove that they have created something useful - then they can fix all these issues. Fixing these issues is not hard. Creating a useful product that people want -- this is the hard part.
- thehappyfellow 21d agoThey are amazingly good at creating hype (non-derogatory) and getting users. Their docs say "Omarchy takes security very seriously" - I think that's straight up incorrect. Saying "go and use it, wanting: its prototype quality and likely to have many security bugs" would be fair game. That's not what they're doing.
- vcryan 21d agoYes, 37Signals DHH have an amazing gift for taking something that is old and not interesting and getting a lot of attention for making it seem new and innovative. That is a gift!
- kristofferR 21d ago> Creating a useful product that people want -- this is the hard part. When you do that you'll just a bunch of people clowning on the project due to the politics of the founder.