7 ms·

Hey Andrew, wavo co-founder here. We definitely understand that some of our users prefer not to use the social sharing features of our app ; hence we added the

Hey Andrew, wavo co-founder here. We definitely understand that some of our users prefer not to use the social sharing features of our app ; hence we added the capability to turn those off, either temporarily with the use of the "social-sharing" switch at the top of the interface --or-- permanently via the preference dialog that you can find in the top left menu.

diggan 14y ago
My own opinion is that people should begin with total control over their sharing, instead of default auto share, and eventually chose to share automatically if they want.
- res0nat0r 14y ago
  I think just based on the title of the HN submission is that this site is built from the ground up to encourage social sharing, so Facebook sharing seems like a sensible default based on that.
andrewcross 14y ago
Thanks for the response. I fully get why you're doing it and appreciate the options to turn them off. With that said, it's really just a band-aid to appease the vocal opponents. My mental model of sharing (and I'd bet it's shared by many others as well) is that there needs to be an explicit "sharing action" taken. I should know exactly what happens when I do something - I don't on your site. As a result, I never get to the "aha" moment because I'm afraid to click on anything.
- cclark20 14y ago
  You are definitely right and we'll be continually looking at better ways to integrate seamless sharing into the app. Seamless sharing is also a "band-aid." It gets users sharing your app at the beginning but there's definitely some users who are turned off by it. So although this is where a lot of our referral traffic comes from at the moment there are undoubtedly better ways to do this and we're working on it. These are early iterations on the product and we'll be circling back very soon.

7 ms·

Hey Andrew, wavo co-founder here. We definitely understand that some of our users prefer not to use the social sharing features of our app ; hence we added the

by glesperance 14y ago

diggan 14y ago
My own opinion is that people should begin with total control over their sharing, instead of default auto share, and eventually chose to share automatically if they want.
- res0nat0r 14y ago
  I think just based on the title of the HN submission is that this site is built from the ground up to encourage social sharing, so Facebook sharing seems like a sensible default based on that.
andrewcross 14y ago
Thanks for the response. I fully get why you're doing it and appreciate the options to turn them off. With that said, it's really just a band-aid to appease the vocal opponents. My mental model of sharing (and I'd bet it's shared by many others as well) is that there needs to be an explicit "sharing action" taken. I should know exactly what happens when I do something - I don't on your site. As a result, I never get to the "aha" moment because I'm afraid to click on anything.
- cclark20 14y ago
  You are definitely right and we'll be continually looking at better ways to integrate seamless sharing into the app. Seamless sharing is also a "band-aid." It gets users sharing your app at the beginning but there's definitely some users who are turned off by it. So although this is where a lot of our referral traffic comes from at the moment there are undoubtedly better ways to do this and we're working on it. These are early iterations on the product and we'll be circling back very soon.