6 ms·
I somehow find it better to give 2 frontier model companies 100-200/month than dropping 10 grand on a hardware that will get old in no time with bad TPS. I real
by gizmodo59 23d ago
I somehow find it better to give 2 frontier model companies 100-200/month than dropping 10 grand on a hardware that will get old in no time with bad TPS. I really want to have a fully local model but seems like one more generation wait and we will be there?
- tyleo 23d agoLots of people use the Mac Mini to run the frontier models over night or while traveling. I have a rack in my basement and have thought about throwing one in. You can get a cheaper machine but Apple feels a little more, “rack and forget,” if you have less price sensitivity. Mac Mini + MacBook Neo w/ ssh can be a better setup than MacBook Pro for many people.
- throwaway219450 22d agoIf it’s purely for experimentation then why not the DGX Spark/GB10? It’s up about 10% from release RRP which is quite good (you might argue it was overpriced then, but prosumer and workstation GPU prices are up 100%). 4TB NVMe is not cheap these days - it’d cost at least $500 for a stick - and you get 128GB at a similar bandwidth to an M5 Pro. Nevermind that Apple still insists on providing base systems with only 512GB of non-upgradable SSD. The equivalent spec mini (4TB/64/10G) is almost $5k for half the VRAM. Not as good a CPU compared to the M5/6 but you also get 20 cores and full CUDA.
- tyleo 22d agoThat does not sound like rack and forget. Just looking at prices it’s also way more expensive.
- henry2023 23d agoYou just described why the datacenter business is hard and as a corollary why space datacenters will not be economically viable.
- jameshart 22d agoYou could spend 100 a month leasing one of these for three years and get the best of both worlds
- chis 22d agoYou’re still stuck paying for a 3 year contract for deprecating hardware. And the 256gb model which is still not enough is $230 a month. And it runs models 8 months behind frontier