5 ms·
At the risk of taking the analogy too far, I would treat refining like modifying a dynamic library. You can technically modify behavior, but only in a very coar
by MeetingsBrowser 23d ago
At the risk of taking the analogy too far, I would treat refining like modifying a dynamic library. You can technically modify behavior, but only in a very coarse way.
post-training is like writing a wrapper around the binary. It is closer to building on top of than truly modifying, in that you can tailor things to your needs slightly but cannot make fundamental changes to the underlying thing.
- adastra22 22d agoAre you assuming single-layer LORA fine-tuning on top? Because with open-weights you can do full back-propagation training to mold the model into whatever shape you want. For a stretched analogy, I think it is more like LEGO sets. Someone hands you a 10,000 piece masterpiece, and a box of unused LEGO parts. Hackers on HN object that the LEGO part manufacturing process is not included, you can't make your own parts, etc. But it's LEGO. You can pull apart the model, see how it is constructed, add your own refinements and features, or even redo it from the ground up. In a practical sense having knowledge about the factory making the parts doesn't really matter here.