`harness` is a term invented/borrowed to describe a vague vision of applying llm in a more controlled manner, suitable for semi organized, complex work. the sad

`harness` is a term invented/borrowed to describe a vague vision of applying llm in a more controlled manner, suitable for semi organized, complex work. the sad part is then people shift the attention from the real problem but seeking inspiration from the terminology. the real problem: is there a general framework to allow llm with limited context size to approach problems, just like a capable newbie integrated into a chaotic code base? how does it work? I think it's an epistemic problem, and my fork of pi: pie (github.com/wangii/pie)