6 ms·

I don't think so. What I can see is a world where we end up with a Chromium-shaped harness, a fully featured standard implementation everyone builds against, b

• deleted 24d ago
  [deleted]
• jbstack 24d ago
  I disagree with this. Unlike training models (which requires huge compute), harness development is available to anyone with an editor and ideas. That means that solo devs and small startups can still make meaningful progress. Also, having only a "standard implementation" makes no sense for a harness. A standard implementation would need to try to be as good as possible at all things. But you'd often want a specialised harness designed for exactly your use case.
  • grim_io 24d ago
    I don't see us tinkering with Pi in 5 years. Some standard solution will emerge, which will be amplified by models being trained specifically to work with it.
• wyre 24d ago
  It is way too early to tell. If we are comparing to web browsers we are in the early 90s with Netscape, IE, Firefox, etc. I don't even think we are at the point where agent's have a metaphorical JavaScript, we are that early. The thing that makes everyone build against Chromium is because web browsers are very hard and it is well supported by dev tools like Electron and Playwright. Harnesses are so easy compared to a web browser, I'm curious what in this world you see that would make building your own harness seem crazy, because I don't see it.