5 ms·
There's some real research-backed evidence that this approach elevates output quality, and it was even discussed a few months back: https://news.ycombinator.com
by zatkin 25d ago
There's some real research-backed evidence that this approach elevates output quality, and it was even discussed a few months back: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47169627 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47169627
- smartbit 25d agoAnthropic confirmed it in their recent report https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49316271 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49316271 > We expect that agents coordinating in the wild will act in higher variance ways than we see here, because they’ll have different backgrounds and therefore different contexts. They also, presumably, won’t all be Claudes.
- johnyzee 25d agoI do use a second Claude (both Opus) to review the first one's output - it almost always finds worthwhile (often critical) observations. They have different 'perspectives', one wants the job done, one wants to find problems, is how I had it explained. Claude chat itself called it 'Claude-on-Claude action', which I found cute.