5 ms·
I think you could argue for it both ways. Then you could claim ternaries are inconsistent too, shouldn't it be: resultA : resultB ? (evaluation) if we always
by simjnd 25d ago
I think you could argue for it both ways. Then you could claim ternaries are inconsistent too, shouldn't it be:
resultA : resultB ? (evaluation)
if we always put result first?
I think the most important piece of if statements and ternaries is the condition being evaluated and it's worth putting that first?
- ulbu 25d agobut zig has no ternaries, so it does not apply to a discussion about zig’s syntax. and ternary is a branch with no variable introduction, so it doesn’t apply again. (it’s basically a weak switch expression, and the value moves leftwards towards its invocation.)