8 ms·
Everyone was saying they shouldn’t just accept the LLM’s output without cautious review. Seems they took the time to make sure it was a good release. Not sure w
by pohl 27d ago
Everyone was saying they shouldn’t just accept the LLM’s output without cautious review. Seems they took the time to make sure it was a good release. Not sure why that doesn’t sound like a valid reason not to rush to you.
- solid_fuel 27d agoIf they had used the time to actually review the code I would agree! But it sure seems like they used the time instead to play whack-a-mole on bugs and cram in about 50 new, completely unrelated features. That implies they still have not actually reviewed the code they are shipping.
- pohl 27d agoYou don’t know that. Also, fixing bugs is good.
- solid_fuel 27d ago> You don’t know that. We’re literally on a thread discussing the release notes, which are filled with new features. > Also, fixing bugs is good. Yes, fixing bugs is good. The Bun team should have spent time on that in the first place, instead of creating a bunch more with this marketing fueled rewrite.