6 ms·
I think if a real human doctor completely fabricated a drug usage history for one of their patients, that would also be news.
by kamranjon 28d ago
I think if a real human doctor completely fabricated a drug usage history for one of their patients, that would also be news.
- paulv 28d agoExactly. When doctors make mistakes, they can be held accountable -- their malpractice insurance rates go up, their licenses are subject to suspension or revocation, they can go to jail (eg if they are pill mills) or they/the practice get a bad review. When AI makes mistakes, what happens? How is it held accountable?
- ars 28d agoDoctors make mistakes pretty much non-stop, and they are rarely held accountable because the system as a whole works OK. AI makes less mistakes than the doctors do (I read a lot of medical notes).
- ButlerianJihad 28d agofnord
- inigyou 28d agoYou know they'd have to be your roommate for that to amount to a positive test, right? They, correctly, assumed that your excuse for having a cannabis-user's dosage of cannabis in you is that you are a cannabis user, not because your neighbor two houses away smokes it.
- ButlerianJihad 28d agoWhat the ever living fuck gave you the idea that they even tested me, bro? And why would they? And why would I be positive? Please fuck off with your shitty unfounded accusations!
- phil21 28d ago> I think if a real human doctor completely fabricated a drug usage history for one of their patients, that would also be news. This happens every single day and is effectively never reported. For far more nefarious reasons than a simple scribing error. Drug seeking behavior enters notes all the time without much evidence and based entirely on a random doctor's (or even a triage nurse) hunch. A significant portion of those notes are outright false and incorrect. Once that is on your file and in a given medical system, you are marked for life.
- inigyou 28d agoThey said drug usage, not drug seeking.