4 ms·
what does the license say? provide source when asked or publish source? OSI is not clear on this either. ("Where some form of a product is not distributed with
by pas 29d ago
what does the license say? provide source when asked or publish source?
OSI is not clear on this either. ("Where some form of a product is not distributed with source code, there must be a well-publicized means of obtaining the source code for no more than a reasonable reproduction cost, [...]")
- ProAm 29d agoSpirit of the law vs Letter of the law argument. Which ever side of the coin you stand on.
- nextaccountic 29d agoGoogle became one of those OEMs that drag their feet and make it a hassle to publish the source code. This happens because they are not interested in open source Android anymore
- wakawaka28 29d agoI hate to be that guy but publishing source online for free theoretically involves unbounded distribution costs that can't be recovered. That isn't the issue here but it should be considered before changing a license.
- Dead_Lemon 29d agoLet not forget that google heavily relies on opensource software. The Linux kernel being the obvious one in this discussion, which they make extensive use of.
- wakawaka28 28d agoSo? The license is for everyone, not just Google.
- ProAm 29d agoGoogle literally has infinite money.
- vjvjvjvjghv 29d agoInfinite money in the pursuit of profit or an ego trip of an exec. No money for the benefit of community or society.
- deleted 28d ago[deleted]
- philipallstar 28d ago"Society" (whomever that is) uses Google services constantly, to society's constant benefit.
- vjvjvjvjghv 28d agoIt seems the main benefit goes to Google.
- philipallstar 27d agoNot from my perspective. I get free mapping anywhere on earth, with traffic information, and can route plan walking, cycling, driving, or public/private transport and likely journey times. I can search the world's web-published information. I'm using a powerful, relatively affordable mobile phone. I can watch anything anyone with a camera uploads to YouTube across the world. I can pay from my phone with a thumbprint verification only. I can take a photo of something and get back what it is and some information about it.
- eviks 29d agoIt doesn't if you use a better theory
- matheusmoreira 29d agoGoogle is worth what, a trillion dollars?
- wakawaka28 28d agoIt's a generic license that doesn't say "by the way, if you've got a market cap above X then you have to host and distribute the code FOR FREE"... Putting such garbage in there would hurt small developers who made popular, nonprofit projects and probably anyone who isn't flush with cash. Imagine being legally obligated to host files in the middle of a DDoS attack, and pay the resulting AWS bill or whatever.
- notpushkin 29d agoGoogle has servers inside ISP networks that distribute YouTube videos. They pay nothing for the distribution costs, I think they don’t even pay for electricity/cooling. If they wanted to distribute Android source code, they wouldn’t have to pay a dime.
- wakawaka28 28d agoRegardless of whether these costs are zero (I doubt they actually are), these licenses apply to EVERYONE who uses them, not just very wealthy companies. It would not be right to essentially require unbounded free hosting or use of specific online tools/platforms, just to be able to comply with the license.
- globular-toast 29d agoAlas, the licences have become outdated and we haven't kept up, because most have played by the spirit of the rules up to this point. There is an expectation that source code will be readily available using modern tooling, like a version control system, but that's not what the licences actually require.
- TheCoelacanth 28d agoGPL requires that source code be in the preferred form for making modifications. If you use source control for your own modifications, then that's obviously the preferred form and you must distribute the source in that form.
- gsquaredxc 28d agoThat’s an ambitious interpretation. The preferred form for making modifications to the Linux kernel also involves having a build cache, but that’s clearly not required to remain GPL compliant.