12 ms·

> NOTE: this is a genuine human work, didnt use LLM generation. I'm sorry, but I don't believe this. The article reads like LLM text post-edited by an AI promp

by mattpk 29d ago

> NOTE: this is a genuine human work, didnt use LLM generation. I'm sorry, but I don't believe this. The article reads like LLM text post-edited by an AI prompted to "write like a non-native English speaker, replace you for u, make errors, etc". The other pages on your site are cough, "the smoking gun". For instance, your "Suckless, single binary, zero-dependency CUDA/C++ inference engine for NVIDIA's DVLT. Reconstructs 3D scenes from a handful of images (depth + rays + camera pose => point cloud), no python, no torch, no framework." project.

yassa9 29d ago
haha : "write like a non-native English speaker" man, Im actually non native speaker xDD "replace you for u" ???? what ?!
john_strinlai 29d ago
errors = llm, no errors = llm, any word from a list of hundreds = llm, absence of any llm-words = suspiciously like an llm instructed not to use those words, declare no llm was used = llm. there is no winning. if you post something in 2026 or beyond, someone is going to exclaim "llm!". i feel badly for aspiring bloggers or writers. it's also getting rather annoying that 50% of comments on hn, regardless of the topic they are posted on, are the exact same comment about llms.
- yassa9 29d ago
  really thank u John, I felt disappointed after those comments, someone below said that the pangram is against my text, I doubted myself and even went to online pangram : https://pangramaidetector.org/ https://pangramaidetector.org/ spent literally half an hour copying each single section and paragraph (removed the code and Katex) and literally all the results are "0% AI-generated text" or max 15%
- speedstyle 28d ago
  It's not because of the errors, it's clearly written by Claude. Although I doubt if they prompted it to make errors, just generated the majority and edited/wrote some parts themself. I find it rather annoying that so many submissions on hn are LLM writing, but yes I don't generally find it worth discussing. except that this one explicitly claims not to be

by mattpk 29d ago

yassa9 29d ago

haha : "write like a non-native English speaker" man, Im actually non native speaker xDD "replace you for u" ???? what ?!

john_strinlai 29d ago

errors = llm, no errors = llm, any word from a list of hundreds = llm, absence of any llm-words = suspiciously like an llm instructed not to use those words, declare no llm was used = llm. there is no winning. if you post something in 2026 or beyond, someone is going to exclaim "llm!". i feel badly for aspiring bloggers or writers. it's also getting rather annoying that 50% of comments on hn, regardless of the topic they are posted on, are the exact same comment about llms.

yassa9 29d ago
really thank u John, I felt disappointed after those comments, someone below said that the pangram is against my text, I doubted myself and even went to online pangram : https://pangramaidetector.org/ https://pangramaidetector.org/ spent literally half an hour copying each single section and paragraph (removed the code and Katex) and literally all the results are "0% AI-generated text" or max 15%
speedstyle 28d ago
It's not because of the errors, it's clearly written by Claude. Although I doubt if they prompted it to make errors, just generated the majority and edited/wrote some parts themself. I find it rather annoying that so many submissions on hn are LLM writing, but yes I don't generally find it worth discussing. except that this one explicitly claims not to be