5 ms·

Can you give an example of how you perceive it? I'm not an AI advocate but in this case I honestly didn't see anything but a clean and informative website. I d

Can you give an example of how you perceive it? I'm not an AI advocate but in this case I honestly didn't see anything but a clean and informative website. I did have the thought that "this software is probably coded with AI agents" but that's just because there has been an explosion in new software lately. But the website itself seemed perfectly normal to me, actually very clean and informative.

TacticalCoder 28d ago
It's the little "punchy" things a Karen would say (no harm meant to real Karens btw): you write a sentence and end with "No account, no telemetry." (and then later on three no's). Humans usually don't write like that: we form sentences, not "punchy taglines for ads". Especially not with a negative form using "no" everywhere: you may see, say, on ads for a BMW: "400 bhp, pure driving pleasure" but you typically won't see "No automated gearbox, no assisted steering". Then the typical "It's X, not Y": "Everything Options+ does, without the account." Funnily enough it's totally trivial to un-LLMish this type of prose but we don't notice it when it's been unkarenified for we then simply don't detect it's been written by an AI.
- INTPenis 28d ago
  It's marketing speak. Emphasizing the main reason for the software, to address the issues with the Logitech software. Normally I'd say you have a point, but this was a poor choice of example.
- breezybottom 28d ago
  Karenified? This isn't reddit.
- monkey_monkey 28d ago
  I'd prefer reading AI slop than your weird Reddit/Tiktok 'unkarenified' shit.
- dallen33 28d ago
  You are 100% spot on with this, not sure why anyone would disagree. The website is clearly AI generated.
  - INTPenis 28d ago
    I'm not trying to say it's not generated, I'm just saying that it doesn't stand out as offensive to me.
orbital-decay 28d ago
If you read and generate enough vibecoded readmes and front pages you can spot one right away. Structuring, no overarching idea, sentence patterns, neo-...isms like "lives" and "lands", etc. It's pretty clear that it's either curated generation (that's why it looks clean and readable to you) or written by a human and sloppified by a model. The website is clearly vibecoded with all these diagrams, it reads exactly like something written by Claude, and you have to be Claude to write exactly like Claude. It's not normal marketing speak/LinkedIn broetry, nor does it need marketing. FWIW I don't really care in this case, just explaining how people can see it's generated. I only care about it working properly and being less bloated than Logitech's stuff. Pretty good that something like this is possible now.

TacticalCoder 28d ago

It's the little "punchy" things a Karen would say (no harm meant to real Karens btw): you write a sentence and end with "No account, no telemetry." (and then later on three no's). Humans usually don't write like that: we form sentences, not "punchy taglines for ads". Especially not with a negative form using "no" everywhere: you may see, say, on ads for a BMW: "400 bhp, pure driving pleasure" but you typically won't see "No automated gearbox, no assisted steering". Then the typical "It's X, not Y": "Everything Options+ does, without the account." Funnily enough it's totally trivial to un-LLMish this type of prose but we don't notice it when it's been unkarenified for we then simply don't detect it's been written by an AI.

INTPenis 28d ago
It's marketing speak. Emphasizing the main reason for the software, to address the issues with the Logitech software. Normally I'd say you have a point, but this was a poor choice of example.
breezybottom 28d ago
Karenified? This isn't reddit.
monkey_monkey 28d ago
I'd prefer reading AI slop than your weird Reddit/Tiktok 'unkarenified' shit.
dallen33 28d ago
You are 100% spot on with this, not sure why anyone would disagree. The website is clearly AI generated.
- INTPenis 28d ago
  I'm not trying to say it's not generated, I'm just saying that it doesn't stand out as offensive to me.

orbital-decay 28d ago

If you read and generate enough vibecoded readmes and front pages you can spot one right away. Structuring, no overarching idea, sentence patterns, neo-...isms like "lives" and "lands", etc. It's pretty clear that it's either curated generation (that's why it looks clean and readable to you) or written by a human and sloppified by a model. The website is clearly vibecoded with all these diagrams, it reads exactly like something written by Claude, and you have to be Claude to write exactly like Claude. It's not normal marketing speak/LinkedIn broetry, nor does it need marketing. FWIW I don't really care in this case, just explaining how people can see it's generated. I only care about it working properly and being less bloated than Logitech's stuff. Pretty good that something like this is possible now.