I believe the article linked addressed the alleged fraud? [edit, since I can't reply to the below comment] > The article addresses it. It doesn't excuse it.

I believe the article linked addressed the alleged fraud? [edit, since I can't reply to the below comment] > The article addresses it. It doesn't excuse it. How do you excuse a fraud that investigations did not find find substantiated? The allegations of fraud in sports, the marathon, the fund raising, and the thesis do not hold up to evidence. 'Its inquiry found citation defects but did not uphold plagiarism, concluding that the problems were caused by “honest and reasonable error”' I'm interested in other documentation countering the claims in this article, not a statement reiterating that he was accused of fraud with no justification.