6 ms·
Nothing wrong with the AI website but it suggests the code is AI too. Nothing wrong with AI code either but it suggests the project may have been built in 2 we
by bjackman 29d ago
Nothing wrong with the AI website but it suggests the code is AI too.
Nothing wrong with AI code either but it suggests the project may have been built in 2 weeks, has no community and low likelihood of ongoing maintenance.
So now overall instead of a flashy website I think the best signal of quality is a boring GitHub README and several months of commit activity, lots of merged PRs.
- Jacopos311 29d agoYeah i agree, the main problema with ai building (wether back end or front end) is that it leaves a lot of holes behind, that at some point really need to be fixex
- alex43578 29d agoHow much ongoing maintenance and community do you need around a mouse configuration utility? If it works for your current mouse, cool. If, down the road, it breaks on a windows update, you get a new mouse, etc; stop using it and you’ll get a full refund for what you paid.
- juggle-anyhow 29d agoWho cares if it is ai software? What matters is if the software is good.
- bjackman 28d agoThat's exactly what I am saying. I don't care if it's AI, I care if it's good. But unfortunately because AI makes creating software very cheap, the old signals to tell you if software is good, no longer work.