I dunno it depends. Letting people know we're not interested in consuming their slop (code, blogs, docs, whatever), that it is revolting to us, should hopefully

I dunno it depends. Letting people know we're not interested in consuming their slop (code, blogs, docs, whatever), that it is revolting to us, should hopefully make them stop peddling it to us. I'm not trying to "make AI go away", I just want people to stop shoving it in my face. It's fine if you believe it's the bees knees and the best thing ever, but we don't. We don't see it that way. Not just for ethical reasons, but also because it's just not that good, it truly feels reasonably smart people are being brainwashed by a machine algorithm performing language based supra normal stimuli in order to optimize the loss-function of "how awesome do people report this algorithm is" -- which is of course exactly the red thread of a signal the RLHF has been training for. I'm not crazy. It's not actually that good. Literally everything that comes out of it, is slightly shitty. When it writes prose, it reads like a dream narrative, without structure or beat, just patches of it that make sense locally, like early Midjourney outputs. Whenever it writes code, it'll make stupid mistakes if you try anything except the things it's been literally RLHF finetuned for, because it lacks spatial insight, temporal insight and anything else that makes the human experience. When I ask it for insight to learn about a new topic, it will "fail to mention" basic key points while also assuming familiarity with jargon words and abbreviations on the subject until I ask and dig deep enough and tell me "thanks for the pushback" after having wasted my time. I tried it so many times, and I hate it. I hate working with it, and I hate people shoving its output in my face. btw I could also say the same about you -- people like me exist, our experience is valid and we're not going away because you're posting about it on the Internet.