6 ms·
Don't dare them to replace cops with AI. That's what they want you to demand, so they can replace cops with AI.
by TheRealPomax 1mo ago
Don't dare them to replace cops with AI. That's what they want you to demand, so they can replace cops with AI.
- jjtheblunt 1mo agothat's desk job work, not policing, it seems, from the article.
- TheRealPomax 1mo agoA computer cannot be held accountable, and so a computer should never be allowed to replace decision making.
- apopapo 1mo agoA computer is paid for and/or run by at least one human being.
- TheRealPomax 1mo agoThis is so factually incorrect I don't even know where to begin. Have you even read about modern LLM usage?
- jst1fthsdys 1mo agoHow many cops or feds do you see being held accountable anymore?
- TheRealPomax 1mo agoSo what you're saying is there are two problems. Why frame that to imply it's not worth making sure people stay accountable, so that people CAN be held accountable again once you help fix the country?
- jjtheblunt 1mo agothat's automated review, which could be considered automated triage, such that any protest of the automated review, by the human offender, requires human review (to your point). that alone should decimate the grift.
- TheRealPomax 1mo agoI think a system that looks like how many hours someone puts in and then sends an email to both them and their boss going "you're abusing overtime, you will work the hours that are in your contract" would work a hell of a lot better to stop that grift. Nothing stopping someone from finding another trick to get those overtime hours if the system rewards that.