> Sure, quality and security suffer, but Sure, it gave you a bad E. coli infection, but look how much of it you could eat. You use a very selective or narrow

> Sure, quality and security suffer, but Sure, it gave you a bad E. coli infection, but look how much of it you could eat. You use a very selective or narrow definition of "better". The "worse" gets swept under the rug without the step where you balance to see if you have a net win. But at least unlike the author of the tweet you made your definition clear, and I appreciate that.