8 ms·
So they announce this to try and take people away from GitHub, but it also depended on GitHub? Am I reading this irony correctly?
by techgnosis 1mo ago
So they announce this to try and take people away from GitHub, but it also depended on GitHub? Am I reading this irony correctly?
- vachina 1mo agoIn this field rebranding/rebadging things is very common. Cursor is no stranger, they tried to pass off Kimi 2.5 as their own awhile ago.
- jjice 1mo agoPass off? They fine tuned ann open model and were very clear and public about it.
- neya 1mo agoNo they were not. Especially if you were an end user, you wouldn't have been able to tell it wasn't their own model. That exactly isn't being clear nor public. CTRL+F "kimi" 0 results https://cursor.com/blog/composer-2 https://cursor.com/blog/composer-2
- jjice 1mo agoAh our miscommunication here is because I was thinking of Composer 2.5, which does. Good point and that's good to know. https://cursor.com/blog/composer-2-5 https://cursor.com/blog/composer-2-5
- InGoodFaith 1mo agoFor Composer 2 they got called out on it and only acknowledged after enough criticism. Here is a link to Lee Robinson saying they will do better to be more transparent with future releases. > Agree with the feedback we should have mentioned the base up front, we will do that for the next model! https://x.com/leerob/status/2035073197561745579 https://x.com/leerob/status/2035073197561745579
- deleted 1mo ago[deleted]
- dmix 1mo agoIf you read the status page: > This incident affected: Automations, Review Agents, Cloud Agents, and Origin. Cursor has built a code review bot (https://cursor.com/bugbot https://cursor.com/bugbot) which integrates with Github similar to Greptile/Coderabbit. Origin has a feature which imports existing github repos to onboard new users. Automation and cloud agents is self explanatory.