6 ms·
> but withhold from others, even though the code change itself is likely small. Prediction: programming is going to change massively not only because the cost
by ctoth 1mo ago
> but withhold from others, even though the code change itself is likely small.
Prediction: programming is going to change massively not only because the cost of creating code will go down, but because people are so tired of this sort of gatekeeping "we know better" from programmers.
- mjr00 1mo ago> Prediction: programming is going to change massively not only because the cost of creating code will go down, but because people are so tired of this sort of gatekeeping "we know better" from programmers. I assume the "gatekeeping" decision to not implement a feature request is coming from someone responsible for the product, not from a developer.
- eterm 1mo agoWhat you're describing as "gatekeeping" is actually Product Ownership and should be applauded, because the alternative is a product owner who abdicates responsibility to the customer.
- datadrivenangel 1mo agoAnd the software without gatekeepers will be regarded as confusing and complicated or buggy. The work to go from software to usable software system is vast.
- ljm 1mo agoThis describes a product with no vision or purpose. People have to take 'no' for an answer sometimes, even if they don't accept it. You can't really 'gatekeep' your own product.
- ethin 1mo agoCan you explain to all of us how this gatekeeping is actually bad? Software would be way, way worse if we just allowed any arbitrary feature to be added to software, and ordinary people who want all the things would have to learn, the hard way, that doing all the things is not actually good.
- subtlejellyfish 1mo agoThank you. I'm spending a lot of time reminding my peers that cheerlead this sort of thing that feedback is usually presented to us a solution, not the underlying problem and that our job is to solve problems, not just vomit out the requested solution.
- ctoth 1mo agoLots of responses to a comment I explicitly did not make. Let me try and spell it out for you folks: demand was suppressed by an access bottleneck, the bottleneck is gone, expect a magnitude of change proportional to how much demand was actually pent up rather than proportional to how much programmers currently think was reasonable to deny. Explicit things I am not saying: gatekeeping was bad, feature creep is good or desirable, etc. etc. etc.
- philipallstar 1mo agoThis really makes it sound as though the programmers were doing something wrong: > people are so tired of this sort of gatekeeping "we know better" from programmers
- grey-area 1mo agoKnock yourself out and change the world, absolutely nobody is stopping you. That you haven’t already does tell us something though.