5 ms·
Not quite, because it knows about quantum entanglement and that’s a little beyond the fifth grade.
by aetherspawn 1mo ago
Not quite, because it knows about quantum entanglement and that’s a little beyond the fifth grade.
- _diyar 1mo agoYou didn’t even read the example you’re referencing.
- deleted 1mo ago[deleted]
- aureate 1mo ago> Quantum entanglement is when a person gets caught in two or more ropes that are connected in a special way. This can happen if the ropes cross each other or if one rope wraps around the other. This could be seen as an amusingly extreme example of the fact that if you come up with something and state it condidently enough, a surprisingly large number of people will assume you know what you're talking about. Presumably, though, you just mistook the unfiltered (trained on the full data) response for the "Little Learner" one.
- aetherspawn 1mo agoI read it, but to be honest it sounded plausible after 1 read (I just assumed it used person interchangeably with object, and I have no idea how quantum entanglement works so the rest was confidence signals)