6 ms·
As for case #1 I personally believe this to be the same as learning from preexisting code as individuals do. But it is of course still an open questions and as
by joarxpablo 1mo ago
As for case #1 I personally believe this to be the same as learning from preexisting code as individuals do. But it is of course still an open questions and as I said I accept the FSF's arguments on not accepting LLM contributions to GNU Emacs. If the scenario is #2, then all LLM outputs are by definition free software; software in the public domain is fully free. The difference is that it is not /copyleft/, and so derivative works do not also have to be free software. But that is still the case for many FLOSS licenses.