6 ms·
1000 Pages / 3.5€ this is expensive as hell. If this is not fastly superior than something like tesseract it is not worth it.
by merb 1mo ago
1000 Pages / 3.5€ this is expensive as hell.
If this is not fastly superior than something like tesseract it is not worth it.
- beernet 1mo agoAgreed. Does the GTM team there really sit together like "oh yeah, that sounds reasonable" while being totally beyond typical market prices?
- Oras 1mo agoEven comparing to AWS Textract or Azure Document Intelligence, this is very expensive (more than double)
- ttyyzz 1mo agoHow does it compare to those services? Are there any benchmarks yet?
- coredog64 1mo agoAnecdotal as I haven't had time for a full benchmark, but I have a dense tabular handwritten form that is pretty challenging: LLMs with vision don't do well because the content isn't English words. Textract did poorly because it was just too dense for their model (although I haven't tried recently) Whereas I tried this model and it was a champ: Reasonable Markdown format with accurate content.
- Oras 1mo agofaced something similar with Azure, try upscaling the page (2x or more) before sending to the OCR, it increased the accuracy a lot for tiny tables on landscape pages.