For some reason we seem to have more patience for bad writing when it's clearly from an LLM. This article starts > US 12,670,045 B1 was filed on 4 March 2026 a

For some reason we seem to have more patience for bad writing when it's clearly from an LLM. This article starts > US 12,670,045 B1 was filed on 4 March 2026 and granted on 30 June. The claims are now readable and they are narrow: a stateless sandbox that pauses a code block, ships one tool call to the client, and resumes by replaying from the top. The prior art that bears on that is durable execution, not CodeAct. This is really hard to parse! What's CodeAct? This article doesn't seem worth anyone's time. (it clearly wasn't worth the author's time to write it).