8 ms·
How would you comment or watch a video if you did that?
by ImJamal 1mo ago
How would you comment or watch a video if you did that?
- amelius 1mo agoYou can still do that. The only thing I'm proposing is to do the filtering on graphical data (what the user actually sees) rather than on the DOM (which can be obfuscated; and which may change every week).
- dudhsudhd 1mo agoI don’t see how presenting an image would allow you to interact with the page, especially if all you are doing is modify the image you’re presenting, not the page itself.
- amelius 1mo agoThink of it as looking at your screen through AR goggles, where the goggles modify the image before it reaches your eyes. Everything happens at the image level so there's no way Meta can obfuscate the DOM to make ads pass through.
- kdksjxjwjd 1mo agoSo the ads are still served, just… hidden. Self-defeating, no?
- ImJamal 1mo agoAre you saying you would get the image, detect the ad in the image, then regenerate the HTML without the ad based on where it was located in the image?
- lokar 1mo agoYou don’t need to regenerate, insert a DOM element to obscure it.
- ceejayoz 1mo agoThat sounds like an upside.