7 ms·
Higher aspect ratio blades are more efficient. It maximises disc area for a given mass of blade (linear-squared relationship). Blade is held straight due to ten
by snovv_crash 1mo ago
Higher aspect ratio blades are more efficient. It maximises disc area for a given mass of blade (linear-squared relationship). Blade is held straight due to tension not purely from torsional strength, so it can be made from a material with high tension strength like carbon fibre which is light. Also it positions the fastest moving blade area far out from the fuselage where there is less blown-drag.
The downside is that the tail rotor is purely loss.
Potentially a similar efficiency could be achieved with two large rotors, but then you end up needing to use cyclic roll to counter drag-induced cyclic yaw, or adding extra pitch mechanisms on each motor mount to make differential yaw.
- narnarpapadaddy 1mo agoSo the wiggle room for efficiency is in the mechanism for counteracting yaw? Either the weight or energy expense of running a tail rotor or quadrotors or variable pitch mounts (or some other clever mechanism)?
- snovv_crash 1mo ago[dead]