That they have the duty to vet their delivery people is why they should be on the hook for damages. > If you're trying to imply nobody gets rides from craigsli

That they have the duty to vet their delivery people is why they should be on the hook for damages. > If you're trying to imply nobody gets rides from craigslist and therefore we don't need to worry about this edge case No, I don't know where you get that. Why are you so hard up to protect Amazon from any liability?