7 ms·
As far as I can tell, Arxiv does not allow an AI to be listed as the author, so publishing there would not have been an option. https://blog.arxiv.org/2023/01/
by jsnell 1mo ago
As far as I can tell, Arxiv does not allow an AI to be listed as the author, so publishing there would not have been an option.
https://blog.arxiv.org/2023/01/31/arxiv-announces-new-policy-on-chatgpt-and-similar-tools/ https://blog.arxiv.org/2023/01/31/arxiv-announces-new-policy...
- fph 1mo agoThe current consensus in mathematical publishing is that LLMs are tools, so they don't get listed among the authors. But nothing would have prevented them from posting these preprints on Arxiv, with the human prompters as authors and the LLM's contribution acknowledged in the text.
- famouswaffles 1mo agoOne of the 2 names on here says they aren't being listed as an author on the paper because their contributions don't meet the standards of authorship. People can call LLMs 'tools' or whatever they want but if you had essentially nothing to do with the breakthrough, you're not an author.