7 ms·

don’t be too quick to judge, putting the text through pangram indicates it’s 100% human written. It didn’t strike me as too AI because it wasn’t superfluous; it

• robocat 1mo ago
  "I Wouldn't Say Pangram is Broken, But I Would Say That It's Brittle": https://freddiedeboer.substack.com/p/i-wouldnt-say-pangram-is-broken-but https://freddiedeboer.substack.com/p/i-wouldnt-say-pangram-i...
• customguy 1mo ago
  > it wasn’t superfluous; it literally was what happened. Yeah, so I gave that sentence to ChatGPT in a new context and asked it to make it longer without saying anything additional, several times, and it still reads fine, more than. The truth is the truth no matter how you put it. https://pastebin.com/gKhCbmNQ https://pastebin.com/gKhCbmNQ https://pastebin.com/9HpkN4tc https://pastebin.com/9HpkN4tc https://pastebin.com/J6znwxZf https://pastebin.com/J6znwxZf https://pastebin.com/wXs84csy https://pastebin.com/wXs84csy https://pastebin.com/LrjVm4JT https://pastebin.com/LrjVm4JT The last one really speaks to me. I wanted to go on but it raised all sorts of questions in me that I think I should investigate instead. It was, in that sense, a change that changed the thing that was being called something without changing the thing that was being called. and Everything that was not the name remained the same. Everything that was the name was no longer the same. Really makes you think.