> I don't understand the controversy at the heart of this post. Did you miss this part from the article: > They switched from talking about bug bounty program

> I don't understand the controversy at the heart of this post. Did you miss this part from the article: > They switched from talking about bug bounty programs, live hacking events, and how they could help you stay secure, to promoting their in-house AI security product and continuous security monitoring tool. notably the in-house AI security product is trained on existing bug bounty reports. > It sounds to me more like the OP already disliked H1 (for its sales practices and general enshittification) and the LLM issue was a convenient excuse to make a clean break. that's pretty harsh to say when OP provided some very valid reasons, imho speaking as someone who's used HackerOne for over a decade. link to H1's "continuous monitoring tool" for the curious: https://www.hackerone.com/product/h1-continuous-testing https://www.hackerone.com/product/h1-continuous-testing