5 ms·
Does this mean religion can be good for the third of the population that needs an imaginary character to be good?
by tweakimp 1mo ago
Does this mean religion can be good for the third of the population that needs an imaginary character to be good?
- mirmor23 1mo agoof course. this experiment is not novel. in the courts witness would swear on the bible (not sure now). Heard this from an Indian friend, and not sure how much of this true - Indian cities used to have problem of folks chewing tobacco and spitting everywhere, so in some places they would have an icon of a Hindu god, and it worked (maybe not with non-hindu).
- lelanthran 1mo ago> Heard this from an Indian friend, and not sure how much of this true - Indian cities used to have problem of folks chewing tobacco and spitting everywhere, so in some places they would have an icon of a Hindu god, and it worked (maybe not with non-hindu). Probably worked with non-hindu as well; after all, people don't usually spit on or in front of religious idols even if those idols are from a different religion.
- podocarp 1mo agoYou don't need to be religious to not spit in front of an idol... I mean if someone put their bag there you would also not spit there. The experiment needs to be repeated with more items!