The article is about not having time to waste. It is not about the expectation of what might happen at the extreme. I understand it's easier to dismiss and poin

The article is about not having time to waste. It is not about the expectation of what might happen at the extreme. I understand it's easier to dismiss and point out an equivocation fallacy than to discuss the main position of the article. As T.S Eliot put it, humankind cannot bear very much reality.