10 ms·
you really revved the weebs with this one
by peter_stokes 1mo ago
you really revved the weebs with this one
- duskdozer 1mo agoNah, I don't especially like the logo myself when I come across those sites, but I do like that "brand" people who want to make money off it and not pay dislike it even more.
- RattlesnakeJake 1mo agoIt seems to come up every time this complaint arises. "I want to use an open source project without being associated with furries" isn't that unreasonable of a request.
- account42 1mo agoMy problem is more that I don't want open source infrastructure I don't control to be infected by this. For my own website I can just make it efficient enough not to need hacks like this.
- Rebelgecko 1mo agoMy understanding is that it's nigh-impossible to run a website without having a dependency on furry-maintained infra (even just basic stuff like BGP)
- account42 1mo agoThere is a difference between some maintainer somewhere being involved in a subculture and graphics from it being the first thing you see when you visit an unrelated website.
- pritambaral 1mo ago> open source project So, one can put in the minimal effort of removing one div. > being associated There's no requirement of association of any kind. See above and below. > request Cool. Pay for your own branding. Request fulfilled. No? Then it's a demand, not a request.