6 ms·
I told you - it's not the correct term. Finding the correct one should be something you can achieve in 5 minutes of research, and then you can confirm your unde
by q3k 1mo ago
I told you - it's not the correct term. Finding the correct one should be something you can achieve in 5 minutes of research, and then you can confirm your understanding with a SME.
To be clear, I am also not an expert - I can pick out things that are wrong because I generally know a thing or two about semiconductor fabrication, but I'm not willing to sign-off on correctness of the whole thing, especially wrt. to modern processes. I personally wouldn't publish anything about this matter without getting it checked by someone else, because I know where the limits of my knowledge are.
The goal of my comment was to bring that to your attention - that you need someone to actually review your content before you continue teaching people the wrong thing. When you're educating people, you're in a position of power that comes with the responsibility of making sure what you write is as correct and clear as possible. You have a duty of care.
- laurentiurad 1mo agoSo you posted a comment, then refused to give details because I can do it myself "in 5 minutes of research"? Like I said previously, this is not meant to be sent to TSMC so they know what to do when opening their new fab in Arizona.
- rcxdude 1mo agoThe point is that it's not a credible resource, and one or two point corrections from randos who can see some of the errors are not likely to change that.
- laurentiurad 1mo agothey haven't pointed any corrections, just complained that something is wrong, which it isn't, it's just wording preference. You nailed it: just two randos on the internet making a statement, nothing that challenges the accuracy of the info.