5 ms·

Looks like a great feature/product/functionality. I hope that Zed editor will make it work with LLMs/agents that run in the terminal, not just the Zen Agent its

Looks like a great feature/product/functionality. I hope that Zed editor will make it work with LLMs/agents that run in the terminal, not just the Zen Agent itself. Is it even possible? I use OMP.sh agent running in Zed terminal.

randomblock1 1mo ago
It supports anything with ACP. So it can actually run Codex and Claude Code, not just the Zed Agent. Looks like omp supports ACP, so all you have to do is specify a Custom Agent in Zed and it should just work. https://omp.sh/docs/acp https://omp.sh/docs/acp https://zed.dev/docs/ai/external-agents https://zed.dev/docs/ai/external-agents
- ok_dad 1mo ago
  This is the killer Zed feature, IMO, that they support almost any agent via extensions. I deleted Cursor but still use the agent via Zed because it’s a lot nicer experience, Zed never had popups telling me Grok is half off. I also use OpenRouter and Zed.dev with it, that’s three providers out of dozens that it supports.
  - vehemenz 1mo ago
    Exactly. The more competitive the space is, the more important it is that products purposefully support 3rd-party providers. Now that people are increasingly switching from Anthropic/OpenAI for inference reseellers and on-prem compute, transparency and portability will be the new values, not being slightly better than the next agent or model.
  - stusmall 1mo ago
    Even more than supporting any agent that support almost anything period. They seem to take the default approach of using open community standards first when adding new features. By investing very heavily in LSP, ACP, DAP, tree-sitter etc it makes it easy for Zed to integrate with tons of different workflows, language, ecosystems etc quickly and easily. Its just good engineering and I love to see it.
- fireant 1mo ago
  Using OMP through ACP inside Zed is drastically worse experience than just running OMP inside Zed terminal. The ACP UI is dreadful and I had bunch of crashes even for first party Codex support.
  - g42gregory 1mo ago
    Yeah, I saw the same degradation. I will try the terminal threads that a poster below has mentioned. It sounds very interesting.
joemccall86 1mo ago
I use this every day — https://zed.dev/blog/terminal-threads https://zed.dev/blog/terminal-threads
- g42gregory 1mo ago
  This looks very promising.

randomblock1 1mo ago

It supports anything with ACP. So it can actually run Codex and Claude Code, not just the Zed Agent. Looks like omp supports ACP, so all you have to do is specify a Custom Agent in Zed and it should just work. https://omp.sh/docs/acp https://omp.sh/docs/acp https://zed.dev/docs/ai/external-agents https://zed.dev/docs/ai/external-agents

ok_dad 1mo ago
This is the killer Zed feature, IMO, that they support almost any agent via extensions. I deleted Cursor but still use the agent via Zed because it’s a lot nicer experience, Zed never had popups telling me Grok is half off. I also use OpenRouter and Zed.dev with it, that’s three providers out of dozens that it supports.
- vehemenz 1mo ago
  Exactly. The more competitive the space is, the more important it is that products purposefully support 3rd-party providers. Now that people are increasingly switching from Anthropic/OpenAI for inference reseellers and on-prem compute, transparency and portability will be the new values, not being slightly better than the next agent or model.
- stusmall 1mo ago
  Even more than supporting any agent that support almost anything period. They seem to take the default approach of using open community standards first when adding new features. By investing very heavily in LSP, ACP, DAP, tree-sitter etc it makes it easy for Zed to integrate with tons of different workflows, language, ecosystems etc quickly and easily. Its just good engineering and I love to see it.
fireant 1mo ago
Using OMP through ACP inside Zed is drastically worse experience than just running OMP inside Zed terminal. The ACP UI is dreadful and I had bunch of crashes even for first party Codex support.
- g42gregory 1mo ago
  Yeah, I saw the same degradation. I will try the terminal threads that a poster below has mentioned. It sounds very interesting.

joemccall86 1mo ago

I use this every day — https://zed.dev/blog/terminal-threads https://zed.dev/blog/terminal-threads

g42gregory 1mo ago
This looks very promising.