8 ms·

Is it frustrating that I used Claude to turn detailed outlines, notes, and discussions into a post? > go anywhere beyond the usual AI good/bad arguments This i

• sublinear 1mo ago
  It might also be the design of the blog post. It's a wall of text and human made diagrams might have actually helped. I kind of don't like the font used for the body text either. That's more subjective, but sans-serif text tends to tire me out with more length and larger glyph size. You have both going on. I've seen plenty of LLM-written posts succeed despite the rambling tone (and because they weren't about AI). People don't really care about or notice LLM writing as much as they claim. Like anything else, it's details. I would expect that a human is still needed for details. On AI... I get tired of the topic only because there's not much new to say, there is so much being said anyway, all the comments spiral into dumb emotion, and even if I added my own take it will get lost in the noise. It might get more traction and still get the ideas across if it was only tangential to AI without explicitly saying it. Those discussions are more balanced and everyone tends to be happier. This post could have strictly focused on the investment side of things and how people let that go to their heads.