> disclosing use of LLMs is just being transparent and honest. is it that hard? Your assertion here is irrelevant to the poster's point. You're focused on the

> disclosing use of LLMs is just being transparent and honest. is it that hard? Your assertion here is irrelevant to the poster's point. You're focused on the "happy path:" everyone has perfect information and judges correctly. If the submitter used AI, they say so and the commenters on the PR agree. If the submitter did not use AI, they don't say they used AI, and the commenters on the PR agree. This is the diagonal elements on the "used AI" confusion matrix. The commenter is pointing out that information and judgment are not perfect and they're concerned about the off-diagonal elements of the confusion matrix. Especially the "Didn't use AI, but some commenters believe that they did" element.