7 ms·

Fable 5 on Max knocks it out of the park: https://imgur.com/a/usR8K7G https://imgur.com/a/usR8K7G Definitely has some creative flourishes. (I made no extra p

Fable 5 on Max knocks it out of the park: https://imgur.com/a/usR8K7G https://imgur.com/a/usR8K7G Definitely has some creative flourishes. (I made no extra prompting. Just the above text. Single shot.)

nsbshsuzuh 2mo ago
[dead]
xeromal 2mo ago
I'm out of credits or I would've tried fable. I knew it would do well
zombot 2mo ago
rex paludis is a nice touch.
- amarant 2mo ago
  It's even Carolus rex paludis! Not sure if fable is a history buff or a Sabaton fan, but I repeat myself.
  - pvaldes 1mo ago
    Frogando III of Haunchburg, AKA Frognando the Tadporrible
nathanappere 2mo ago
It makes the frog a king which is not in the prompt, so there is a bit of confusion.
- DimitriBouriez 2mo ago
  I'm afraid you'll need to look up "Habsburg" yourself.
  - TonyStr 2mo ago
    Nathan is right though. It specifies a Habsburg jaw, not that the frog is a Habsburg king/prince. It's understandable that the LLM will hallucinate a king from this, but it isn't what's being asked of it.
    - tjoff 2mo ago
      It's not hallucination. The prompt lacks details and given that an AI or a human has some artistic freedom. After all, that is why current AI is usable at all.
    - bulbar 1mo ago
      When I ask to create an image of a smartphone, it will most likely show the front and while it's turned on, even though it's not mentioned. For a person, it will add clothing. Adding things that are not explicitly stated in the prompt but that are probable are the main benefit of AI, as far as I am concerned.
      - inigyou 1mo ago
        I'm afraid you'll need to look up "frog prince" yourself. It was fictional.
        bulbar 1mo ago
        Not sure what the argument here is. I expect AI to consider fictional entities if they are semantically connected to the prompt.
    - rcxdude 1mo ago
      An artist given the same prompt would likely do something similar.
inigyou 1mo ago
Uh, it failed the test by assuming it was royalty.

nsbshsuzuh 2mo ago

[dead]

xeromal 2mo ago

I'm out of credits or I would've tried fable. I knew it would do well

zombot 2mo ago

rex paludis is a nice touch.

amarant 2mo ago
It's even Carolus rex paludis! Not sure if fable is a history buff or a Sabaton fan, but I repeat myself.
- pvaldes 1mo ago
  Frogando III of Haunchburg, AKA Frognando the Tadporrible

nathanappere 2mo ago

It makes the frog a king which is not in the prompt, so there is a bit of confusion.

DimitriBouriez 2mo ago
I'm afraid you'll need to look up "Habsburg" yourself.
- TonyStr 2mo ago
  Nathan is right though. It specifies a Habsburg jaw, not that the frog is a Habsburg king/prince. It's understandable that the LLM will hallucinate a king from this, but it isn't what's being asked of it.
  - tjoff 2mo ago
    It's not hallucination. The prompt lacks details and given that an AI or a human has some artistic freedom. After all, that is why current AI is usable at all.
  - bulbar 1mo ago
    When I ask to create an image of a smartphone, it will most likely show the front and while it's turned on, even though it's not mentioned. For a person, it will add clothing. Adding things that are not explicitly stated in the prompt but that are probable are the main benefit of AI, as far as I am concerned.
    - inigyou 1mo ago
      I'm afraid you'll need to look up "frog prince" yourself. It was fictional.
      - bulbar 1mo ago
        Not sure what the argument here is. I expect AI to consider fictional entities if they are semantically connected to the prompt.
  - rcxdude 1mo ago
    An artist given the same prompt would likely do something similar.

inigyou 1mo ago

Uh, it failed the test by assuming it was royalty.