5 ms·
As a maintainer of an open source project I largely care about CI, discoverability on the web, and the sign up burden being small so that issues continue to be
by oooyay 2mo ago
As a maintainer of an open source project I largely care about CI, discoverability on the web, and the sign up burden being small so that issues continue to be reported. I think Radicle and Tangled are probably the future in that way. Tangled needs to support private repositories and Radicle needs a real CI solution. We're not far off from either.
- jeremyjh 2mo agoTangled is a de facto centralized platform and it is VC funded. It is not the future.
- oooyay 2mo agoI don't mind that Tangled is VC funded as long the tech is open (it is) and as far as I can discern it is federated and decentralized. You and I probably have different ideas of what the future may be and that's okay.
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- jeremyjh 1mo agoIn practice it is centralized: you can host your own PDS and knot but if tangled.org decides you don’t align with their values then they stop indexing you and no one will see your work in the only place tangled users look. ATproto has some real benefits - data sovereignty is possible - but for this particular use case it only makes it possible for you to migrate your connections and history to the next place that everyone is going to.
- inigyou 2mo agoCodeberg offers free CI if your project fits in their ethos.