6 ms·

Suggesting that a robot is the more privacy friendly option is an interesting take.

• Marha01 2mo ago
  Why not? A recording from a robot can be potentially viewed by a real human, if the company is not reputable (happened with robotic vacuums). But by default, no humans will view it. A human house cleaner by definition is a real human looking at your home every time.
  • defrost 2mo ago
    One human, with a single set of human eyes and a limited network of associates with few immediate criminals looking to take advantage (although, yes, that does happen). Versus a small army of roomba's and equivalents mapping out floor plans and tangentially exposing human occupation times with that large data set almost certainly exposed to criminal and surveillance networks that will almost certainly use some of that choicer data to their advantage. It's literally trade offs in both cases.
    • infinitezest 2mo ago
      It's really surprising how many people fail to account for scale when determining the risks presented by some of this new tech.