6 ms·

So you're fine with your code having unintended behaviour, as long as that unintended behaviour passes a test that the agent wrote? My preferred approach is to

by jbstack 2mo ago

So you're fine with your code having unintended behaviour, as long as that unintended behaviour passes a test that the agent wrote? My preferred approach is to read and understand everything the LLM produces AND have it create test suites (which I also read and understand). The LLM can help you with that too - just have it breakdown and explain the code at each iteration.

energy123 2mo ago
If it's code for a pacemaker, it should be reviewed by multiple humans. If it's code for an unimportant side project, I will never read it. Between those extremes are shades of grey. Part of our job in this new era is to understand the worst-case consequences of a bug given how the code interacts with the world, then allocate our effort based on that understanding. This can only be done on a case by case basis.
- hansvm 2mo ago
  If you don't, at a bare minimum, read the code once though, you don't know how it interacts with the world.
  - energy123 2mo ago
    [dead]