7 ms·
> I think that one should at least have one's own domain instead of example.substack.com. I thought about this question when I recently started writing a few a
by Stratoscope 2mo ago
> I think that one should at least have one's own domain instead of example.substack.com.
I thought about this question when I recently started writing a few articles on Substack.
I chose not to use my own domain, even though I have a few.
Why? I want my writing to outlive me.
When I am no longer able to pay for domain renewals, my own domains will expire. Hopefully {my-hn-username}.substack.com will still be around.
Time will tell.
- throw0101d 2mo ago> Why? I want my writing to outlive me. Donate to archive.org.
- Stratoscope 2mo agoExcellent point! In fact I do have an automatic monthly donation to The Internet Archive. Of course the URLs all change in archived pages, but at least the content is there for anyone motivated enough to find it. A funny coincidence... I registered geary.com (my last name) in 1994, and just used it for email. A few years later I got a letter from a group of civic boosters in Geary, Oklahoma. They even enclosed a Geary Water Tower T-shirt which I still have. They saw that I didn't have a website up on this domain and asked me if they could have it. I explained that this would be impractical since it was also my email address. So they registered gearyok.com instead and put up a website built around Java applets. Oops. But it got me thinking. I put up a static page (frequently edited by me) that I called Geary Central: A Guide to Gearys on the Net. This page is still up: https://www.geary.com/oldsite.html https://www.geary.com/oldsite.html Naturally I gave Geary, Oklahoma top billing for inspiring this. A few years after that I changed geary.com to a MoinMoin wiki devoted to the same topic, and moved the old static page to its current location. Just a few days ago, someone emailed me about how they had stumbled onto my oldsite.html page and enjoyed this "blast from the past". In 2011, my old ISP decommissioned the server I had the wiki on. I was planning to migrate it to something more modern like Drupal, but the time and effort weren't worth it to me at the time. I did find the latest version of the "new" Geary Central on archive.org and shared it in my reply: https://web.archive.org/web/20110927053309/http://www.geary.com/ https://web.archive.org/web/20110927053309/http://www.geary....
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- reddalo 2mo ago>{my-hn-username}.substack.com will still be around I wouldn't be so sure. Platforms come and go, they change domains (e.g. Twitter), they merge, they die.
- inigyou 2mo agoIt's very unlikely Substack will still be around when you die, if you're younger than 60.
- Stratoscope 2mo agoWhat if I'm 74? ;-)
- throw0101d 2mo agoIf you're in the US, average life expectancy is 79, so it will probably be fine for the next ~5 years. If you're in Canada, or a G7/EU nation, it's in the 80s, so you may have 10+ years to go, so the chances of Substack being around in the same form for that time period is lower.
- HALtheWise 2mo agoAverage life expectancy is the wrong thing to use here, since life expectancy _assuming you're still alive at 74_ is actually 13.1 yr in the US.
- sebastiennight 2mo agoThis strategy for your legacy would not have been successful with stratoscope.geocities.com (RIP 2009), skyblog.com/stratoscobe (died in 2023 with no data export path offered), Posterous, MSN Spaces, Vine, and many others. I am willing to bet that most of my domains will outlive "username.substack.com".