5 ms·
Fair enough about the other points. But this is a ridiculous "hot take": > There are no sex scenes, and all the food looks horrible. Yes and if there were sex
by bragh 2mo ago
Fair enough about the other points. But this is a ridiculous "hot take":
> There are no sex scenes, and all the food looks horrible.
Yes and if there were sex scenes, then the film would get criticized for having sex scene(s), not being able to tell the story of a Greek epic without turning it into erotica or something.
- runarberg 2mo agoI read this as a stylistic choice by the reviewer, she was clearly having a great time writing this awesome review, and decided to put this at the end of her conclusion to add flavor to to it, something she points out is missing in the movie. This review was an amazing read, by an amazing writer, and in my opinion these 11 words were the best part.
- squidsoup 2mo agoGreek mythology is full of sex, and the Odyssey is no exception.
- bragh 2mo agoYes, but the film was made for modern audiences using the modern translation. Isn't it somewhat ridiculous to criticize a film for exactly following the cultural conventions it is supposed to follow?
- petesergeant 2mo agoThe Odyssey is full of worrying about who might bang who, rather than actual sex.
- GlobalFrog 2mo agoAnd there are no sex scene in the original tale. Sex is slightly evocated by two mentions of Ulysses sharing the bed or Circe and Calypso, but without any depiction of sex.
- wzdd 2mo agoWilson didn’t write “sex scene”, she wrote “sex”. In the story there is plenty of implied sex. In the movie there is none. It’s not a major issue in itself, it’s part of a broader point about movie Odysseus being “uncomplicated” versus the story— both morally, and when it comes to passions (sex, food, revenge).
- comex 2mo agoThe review does in fact use the phrase “sex scenes”. Not that I disagree with your latter point.
- bragh 2mo agoIt was a direct quote from the review. Yes, she did use "sex scenes".
- ButlerianJihad 2mo ago[flagged]
- Barrin92 2mo agoNolan, by his own account, has made clear that he doesn't consider himself captured by his audiences and makes what he likes so I'd say it's allowed to talk about inclusion or exclusion of material on their own merit, not what people would have to say about it. Not just in this movie but in general I think Nolan lacks any kind of sensuality, lyrical qualities, humor or eroticism. Which are key features of classical literature. Cosmic seduction, divine erotic passions are a big deal in the Odyssey and Nolan is closer to the "asexual Ken doll Marvel superhero" genre than he is to the classics with this one.