7 ms·
Or just use Linux.
by Nevin1901 2mo ago
Or just use Linux.
- altcognito 2mo agoThat's exactly the advice at the end.
- ranger_danger 2mo ago/etc/machine-id also exists
- sudonem 2mo agoAnd it’s easily altered.
- ranger_danger 2mo agoIt can still be correlated with past IDs by countless other methods in order to keep tracking you further.
- kvuj 2mo agoBut then you're using other methods, you're not using the ID as tracker. In fact if you just remove it, it eliminates this entire discussion.
- ranger_danger 2mo agoThe trick is to combine it all, which is what MS is doing. For example your MS account stores any GDIDs that you've logged in with. If you use a different identifier to track changes in a GDID/machine-id/etc., that means you can continue tracking using mainly just the new machine-id, but you should always keep trying to correlate it with other things in case it changes.
- jolmg 2mo agoBut you don't have a service uploading it along with the URLs you visit, which is the creepy part. The ID itself can be useful for your own administration. And if such a service were to appear, it could easily be removed. Everything in Linux is optional, especially as long as you stick to open source.
- ranger_danger 2mo agoHow do we know? Does anyone check for things like this? Many, many apps read /etc/machine-id if you do a quick github search. Apps may have been silently correlating our activity for years without us knowing. We know DHCP, EFI, GNOME, popularity-contest and many other apps already use it. There are countless ways it could be used already that are hard to detect.
- cyphar 2mo agoIt should be noted that the "correct" usage of /etc/machine-id is that you use it in a way that doesn't allow cross-correlation between different applications by using a HMAC of the machine-id with an application-specific UUID instead of using it directly. systemd-id128 has a command line flag to do this for you. Whether everyone does that correctly, that's a different question. On the other hand, while developers should be more careful about how they use identifiers like this, if an application on your machine wants to track you they don't need /etc/machine-id.
- ranger_danger 2mo agoYes I think privacy and security on the desktop has fallen way behind mobile and we need much stronger protection these days.
- jolmg 2mo agoMobile's came at the cost of composability between programs and the imposition of policy, which are against the Unix Philosophy. I wouldn't make that trade. Mobile's a sad state of affairs, inferior to desktop in many ways. You can most likely get better security than mobile's, you just need to e.g. learn to write your own SELinux policies, etc. Facilities are there; they just have a learning curve.
- Bender 2mo ago/etc/machine-id also exists Indeed. One can regenerate it on each shutdown / reboot. The process is a little different depending on whether one has systemd or not. It's a dbus thing but systemd ingests it and there is a specific process around updating that in systemd. There is also the NetworkID in Firefox about:networking#networkid Another trackable piece of information on most systems is the creation time of / which just about any application can query unless it is properly isolated. This can be turned into a short unique hash. There are hacky ways to change the Birth time on unmounted filesystems using debugfs which may result in corruption. Some overlay filesystems do not support Birth time but that is not going to help most people unless the general populous expect all applications to be isolated in name spaces and overlay filesystems but this would have to be an expected pattern across all applications universally. stat / | grep irth Birth: 2023-04-17 20:27:01.000000000 +0000 stat / | grep irth | md5sum 8b5e849954373f8f3c2a625847e4e858
- Peanuts99 2mo agoYou can do the same with the GDID, it's stored in the registry.
- subzero06 2mo agoExactly , windows should be used for gaming. :D
- wnevets 2mo agoOr don't commit fraud worth millions of dollars using your personal Windows machine.