5 ms·
From the opposite angle, there's apparently evidence that the RAM companies themselves are price fixing: https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/samsung-sk-h
by jmholla 2mo ago
From the opposite angle, there's apparently evidence that the RAM companies themselves are price fixing: https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/samsung-sk-hynix-and-micron-sued-over-alleged-dram-price-fixing-amid-record-memory-costs https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/samsung-sk-hynix-...
- Klonoar 2mo agoThe existence of a lawsuit is not evidence.
- john01dav 2mo agoThat's false. It's evidence, but it isn't conclusive. Someone thought that the law suit was worth filing, and that could be because the law suit has a chance of succeeding. It could also be some other reason, and it could also fail even if completely good faith -- this is why the evidence is non-conclusive.
- cromka 2mo agoBy your logic, counter-lawsuits and especially the SLAPP suits are also evidence.
- fragmede 2mo agoStill, RAM manufacturers have a long history of price fixing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DRAM_industry_price_fixing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DRAM_industry_price_fixing
- Klonoar 2mo ago> Someone thought that the law suit was worth filing No, someone thought that they could win a lawsuit. We live in a highly litigious society. This happens all the time. It's not _evidence_, it's _suspicion_, and it's asking it to be reviewed in a court of law.
- MagicMoonlight 2mo ago[dead]